메뉴 건너뛰기

군사국방

국방뉴스

[ISW] 이란 업데이트, 2025년 7월 30일

by Summa posted Jul 31, 2025
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

ESC닫기

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

ESC닫기

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
```html 주요 내용 요약

주요 내용 요약:

  • 이란의 안보 정책 강화 시도: 이란 의회는 이스라엘-이란 전쟁 이후, 안보 관련 법안을 이례적으로 높은 빈도로 지지하고 통과시키면서 이란 안보 정책 형성에 영향력을 행사하려 시도하는 것으로 보입니다. 7월 27일 의회에서 통과된 법안은 대중 시위 진압 능력을 더욱 확대하는 내용을 담고 있습니다. 하지만 마수드 페제시키안 이란 대통령 내각은 7월 30일 이 법안을 의회에서 철회했는데, 이는 이란 정권 내 온건파와 강경파 사이의 갈등을 보여줍니다.
  • 헤즈볼라 무장 해제: 미국은 헤즈볼라 무장 해제 결의안을 표결하도록 레바논 내각에 압력을 가하고 있다고 보도되었습니다. 나와프 살람 레바논 총리는 헤즈볼라와 아말 운동으로부터 무장 해제 결의안에 대한 지지를 얻으려 시도하고 있으며, 이는 헤즈볼라가 무장 해제를 계속 거부하고 있어 미국-레바논 간의 협상을 더욱 지연시킬 가능성이 높습니다.
  • 이란-중국 군사 협력: 이란은 미국 소유의 GPS(Global Positioning System, 전 지구 측위 시스템)를 중국의 BeiDou(베이더우) 위성 항법 시스템으로 대체하려 할 수 있습니다. 이란의 BeiDou에 대한 관심은 전쟁 이후 이란과 중국 간의 군사 및 국방 협력 증가의 일환입니다.

분류:

  • 정치
  • 안보
  • 국제 관계

관련 주요 국가:

  • 이란
  • 레바논
  • 미국
  • 중국

향후 전망:

  • 이란 내 강경파와 온건파의 갈등이 지속될 수 있으며, 이는 국내 정치적 불안정성을 야기할 수 있습니다.
  • 헤즈볼라의 무장 해제 문제는 레바논의 정치적 혼란을 심화시키고, 미국과의 관계에 긴장을 고조시킬 수 있습니다.
  • 이란과 중국 간의 군사 협력 증가는 중동 지역의 지정학적 균형에 영향을 미칠 수 있습니다.
```

[원문]

Katherine Wells, Avery Borens, Ben Rezaei, Ria Reddy, Ben Schmida, Kelly Campa, and Annika Ganzeveld


Information Cutoff: 2:00 PM ET

Click here to view ISWCTP's interactive control-of-terrain map of Syria.


Click here to view ISW's complete portfolio of interactive maps.

The Iranian Parliament appears to be trying to play an influential role in shaping Iranian security policy following the Israel-Iran War by supporting and approving security-related legislation at an anomalously high rate. Parliament recently approved a bill on July 27 that would further expand the regime’s ability to suppress public dissent. The bill targets unspecified “fake news” on social media and only applies to social media accounts with over 90,000 followers. The regime could define anti-regime statements or unapproved narratives as “fake news” to suppress regime dissidents. The "fake news“ bill is the latest of several security-related pieces of legislation that Parliament has approved since the conclusion of the war, which is consistent with the regime’s efforts to securitize Iranian society following the war. Parliament approved an espionage bill on June 29 that targets suspected spies or individuals aiding hostile states. The regime could use the espionage bill to target any Iranian who opposes the regime, similar to the "fake news” bill. The Guardian Council still needs to approve the espionage bill in order for it to become law. Parliament separately passed a bill on July 2 to suspend Iranian cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which could undermine moderate pro-negotiations officials’ ability to comply with foreign demands for Iran to cooperate with the IAEA. The Iranian Parliament regularly passes legislation, including legislation related to security, but the rate at which it has done so following the war is anomalous and may reflect Parliament’s efforts to play a more significant role in shaping Iranian security policy.


Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s cabinet withdrew the “fake news” bill from Parliament on July 30, which highlights the fissures between moderate and hardliner elements in the Iranian political sphere. The decision to withdraw the bill may also reflect government concerns that the legislation could trigger popular unrest. Pezeskhian’s cabinet withdrew the bill to maintain "national unity,” according to the Iranian government spokesperson. The Government Information Council head separately stated that Pezeshkian’s cabinet withdrew the bill in order to avoid causing "concern and discomfort” to the Iranian people. The decision comes after the justice minister, legal experts, and civil society members reviewed the bill on July 30 upon Pezeshkian’s request and amid criticism from reformist and moderate factions that the bill would further erode trust between the regime and the Iranian people. Iranian hardliners, who comprise the majority of Parliament, will likely oppose Pezeshkian’s decision to withdraw the bill. 


The United States is reportedly pressuring the Lebanese Council of Ministers to vote on a resolution to disarm Hezbollah. The United States and Lebanon have exchanged multiple proposals to disarm Hezbollah during ongoing negotiations over the past six weeks but have unable not been able to reach an agreement. The Lebanese government gave US Special Envoy Thomas Barrack an updated proposal during his visit to Beirut in early July, which Israel rejected. Five unspecified sources told Reuters on July 29 that the United States will no longer engage in direct negotiations or “pressure Israel” to stop operations in Lebanon until the Lebanese Council of Ministers votes on a resolution that commits the Lebanese government to disarming Hezbollah. The 24-member Council of Ministers is Lebanon’s executive body that sets and implements the Lebanese government’s policies. A council decision would make Hezbollah’s disarmament Lebanese state policy and publicly affirm the government’s commitment to do so. Unspecified political sources told Lebanese media that French President Emmanuel Macron advised Salam to hold a council session to pass a resolution to monopolize the state’s arms during their July 24 meeting.


Key Takeaways:


  • Iranian Securitization Efforts: The Iranian Parliament appears to be trying to play an influential role in shaping Iranian security policy following the Israel-Iran War by supporting and approving security-related legislation at an anomalously high rate. This legislation includes a bill that Parliament approved on July 27 that would further expand the regime’s ability to suppress public dissent. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s cabinet withdrew this bill from Parliament on July 30, which highlights the fissures between moderate and hardliner elements in the Iranian regime.


  • Hezbollah Disarmament: The United States is reportedly pressuring the Lebanese Council of Ministers to vote on a resolution to disarm Hezbollah. Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam is attempting to obtain support for a disarmament resolution from Hezbollah and the Amal Movement before convening the council for a vote, which will likely further stall US-Lebanon negotiations given that Hezbollah continues to refuse to disarm.


  • Iran-China Military Cooperation: Iran may be trying to replace its US-owned Global Positioning System (GPS) with the PRC’s BeiDou satellite navigation system. Iran’s interest in BeiDou is part of a broader increase in Iranian military and defense cooperation with the PRC following the war.

Click Here to Read the Full Update

Website | Jobs & Internships


Follow ISW on social media:


Facebook | X | YouTube | Instagram | LinkedIn | Threads | Bluesky

Donate online or by sending a check to the Institute for the Study of War at 1400 16th Street NW, Suite #515, Washington, DC, 20036. Please consider including the Institute for the Study of War in your estate plans.


ISW is a tax-exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Donations are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.


The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a non-partisan, non-profit, public policy research organization. ISW advances an informed understanding of military affairs through reliable research, trusted analysis, and innovative education. We are committed to improving the nation's ability to execute military operations and respond to emerging threats in order to achieve US strategic objectives.

TAG •

위로